Bridging the Paradox: Women's Political Participation and Leadership in Contemporary India
By Rishi Dalvi•
Introduction: The Paradox of Power
Women form nearly half of India’s population and vote at rates comparable to or higher than men. Yet representation remains low.
- 797 women contested the 2024 general election (≈9.5% of candidates).
- 74 women were elected to the Lok Sabha (13.6%), down slightly from 78 in 2019 (14.4%).
This underrepresentation persists despite India’s history of powerful women leaders and the passage of the Women’s Reservation Act (2023).
Structural Underrepresentation: The Numbers
| Representation Metric | India (18th Lok Sabha) | Global Comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Women in Lok Sabha (MPs) | 13.6% (74 MPs) | Global average ≈ 26.9% |
| Women in State Assemblies | ~9% average | No state exceeds 20% |
| Women in Local Bodies | ~44% (≈1.37M reps) via 73rd/74th Amendments | Demonstrates quota effectiveness |
Party-wise Representation (18th Lok Sabha)
| Party | Women MPs | Proportion of Party MPs |
|---|---|---|
| BJP | 31 | 12.9% |
| INC | 13 | 13.1% |
| TMC | 11 | 39.3% (highest) |
The TMC’s relatively high proportion underscores the role of party will and gatekeeping.
The Women’s Reservation Act, 2023
- Mandate: Reserves 33% of seats for women in the Lok Sabha, State Assemblies, and Delhi Assembly.
- Sub-reservation: Includes SC/ST women within the quota.
- Implementation: Contingent on the next census and subsequent delimitation—likely post-2029.
Persistent Structural Challenges
- Economic constraints: High campaign costs and asset ownership gaps limit entry.
- Socio-cultural barriers: Patriarchal norms influence party nominations and mobility.
- Violence and security: Gendered threats, including pervasive online abuse, deter participation.
Path Forward
A multi-stakeholder approach is essential: implement the Reservation Act effectively; improve safety and financing access; and dismantle party gatekeeping by recruiting and promoting women from grassroots structures.